Policy and Legal Update - March 24-30, 2014
Marriage Equality USA Projects Manager Ned Flaherty closely monitors marriage equality polls, ballots, laws, and lawsuits nationwide, and keeps the MEUSA website updated with changes in these areas on a near-daily basis. Every Monday we update you via our blog with policy and legal updates covering the preceding week.
You may always find the most up-to-date information, including changes that have taken place between these weekly posts, on the Current Policy & Legal Status page on the MEUSA website.
Send questions and comments to: [email protected].
POLICY & LEGAL UPDATES
News reported March 24 – 30, 2014
NATIONAL MAP
NATIONAL POLLS
- On 27 March 2014, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research surveyed 1,000 likely 2016 voters, and reported that 55% favor it, 40% do not, with 5% unaccounted for. Separately, 62% believe same-gender civil marriage will be legalized by the U.S. Supreme Court, and 33% do not, with 5% unaccounted for. • MEUSA Summary • News Source
STATE POLLS
WISCONSIN • On 26 March 2014, Marquette Law School surveyed 801 registered WI voters on same-gender civil marriage, and reported that 48% support it, 24% support only civil union, and 24% support no legal recognition for same-gender couples, with 4% unaccounted for. Separately, regarding the 2006 constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriage, 59% would repeal it, and 36% would continue it, with 5% unaccounted for. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceNATIONAL LEGISLATION PENDING
NATIONAL LEGISLATION ENACTED
LAWSUITS PENDING
ALABAMA • On 20 March 2014, in Paul Hard v. AL Governor Robert Bentley, et al., a federal lawsuit to: (1) overturn the 1998 AL law and the 2005 AL constitutional amendment which ban same-gender civil marriage; (2) issue a revised Death Certificate for Charles Fancher showing Paul Hard as the surviving spouse, based on their 2011 MA marriage; and (3) disburse the proceeds of a wrongful death suit to Paul Hard, Ms. Pat Fancher, mother of Charles Fancher, asked to intervene because (a) she opposes same-gender civil marriage; and (b) she wants to remain her deceased son’s next of kin and receive all the wrongful death proceeds of his estate. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARIZONA • On 24 March 2014, in Nelda Majors & Karen Bailey, et al. v. AZ Attorney General Tom Horne, et al., a federal lawsuit for 7 couples, and the surviving spouses of 2 additional same-gender couples, challenging the AZ 1996 and 1999 laws and the AZ 2006 constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriage, plaintiffs asked that their case be (1) merged with Joseph Connolly & Terrel Pochert, et. al., v. Pinal County Superior Court Clerk Chad Roche, and (2) decided by the same judge. • MEUSA Summary • News Source LOUISIANA • On 18 March 2014, in Forum for Equality Louisiana v. Louisiana Revenue Secretary Tim Barfield, et al., a federal case for 4 same-gender couples challenging the LA constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriages performed in LA or elsewhere, and challenging LA’s refusal to recognize both spouses as parents to children that are born to them or children that they adopt, the court consolidated this case into Jonathan Robicheaux & Derek Pinton, et al. v. LA Attorney General James Caldwell. The common issues (equal protection; due process for recognizing out-of-state same-gender civil marriages) will be decided first; the non-common issues (1st Amendment; LA marriage rights; Full Faith and Credit between states) will be decided later. The consolidation caused a revised 2014 schedule: cross motions for summary judgment (due 17 April), amicus briefs (12 May), cross responses to motions (19 May), replies (2 June), oral arguments (25 June), ruling (1 July), appeal to 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (1 August). • MEUSA Summary • News Source LOUISIANA • On 18 March 2014, in Jonathan Robicheaux & Derek Pinton, et al. v. LA Attorney General James Caldwell, a federal lawsuit for 2 couples challenging the LA constitutional amendment and state law banning same-gender civil marriage, and seeking LA recognition for same-gender couples married elsewhere, the court consolidated into this case Forum for Equality Louisiana v. Louisiana Revenue Secretary Tim Barfield, et al., a federal suit for 4 same-gender couples challenging the LA constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriages performed in LA or elsewhere, and challenging LA’s refusal to recognize both spouses as parents to children that are born to them or children that they adopt. The common issues (equal protection; due process for recognizing out-of-state same-gender civil marriages) will be decided first; the non-common issues (1st Amendment; LA marriage rights; Full Faith and Credit between states) will be decided later. The consolidation caused a revised 2014 schedule: cross motions for summary judgment (due 17 April), amicus briefs (12 May), cross responses to motions (19 May), replies (2 June), oral arguments (25 June), ruling (1 July), appeal to 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (1 August). • MEUSA Summary • News Source WISCONSIN • On 24 March 2014, in Virginia Wolf & Carol Schumacher, et al., v. WI Governor Scott Walker, et al., a federal lawsuit for 4 couples challenging the 2006 WI ban on same-gender civil marriage or civil union, and WI's unique ban on marrying elsewhere, for which each spouse faces up to $10,000 in fines and 9 months in prison as soon as they return to WI, the judge denied the WI motion to stay this case until the WI Supreme Court rules on the WI domestic partner registry case (Julaine Appling, et al., v. WI Governor Scott Walker, et al.), saying that a such stay would be pointless, and scheduled the 2014 trial for August 25-29. • MEUSA Summary • News Source MICHIGAN • On 25 March 2014, in April DeBoer & Jayne Rowse v. MI Governor Rick Snyder, et al.,a challenge to the MI laws that deny adoption to certified foster parents when they are not married, the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals stayed the district court ruling pending the outcome of the MI appeal. • MEUSA Summary • News Source PUERTO RICO • On 26 March 2014, in Ada Conde v. PR Health Secretary & Vital Records Registrar,an attorney filed a federal lawsuit to have her 2004 same-gender civil marriage from MA recognized in PR. • MEUSA Summary • News Source MICHIGAN • In late March 2014, in April DeBoer & Jayne Rowse v. MI Governor Rick Snyder, et al.,a federal challenge to MI laws that deny adoption to certified foster parents when they are not married, and the constitutionality of the state’s 2004 ban on same-gender marriage, civil union, domestic partnership, and joint adoption, the court set the appeal deadlines: 7 May (MI brief), 9 June (plaintiff brief), and 26 June (MI response brief). • MEUSA Summary • News Source MISSOURI • On 26 March 2014, in Kerry Messer, et al. v. MO Governor Jeremiah Nixon, et al., the MO Family Baptist Convention Christian Life Commission and the MO Family Policy Council sued to stop MO from accepting tax returns from same-gender couples with legal civil marriages who file joint federal and MO returns, because the plaintiffs claim that they are already suffering “immediate and irreparable damage.” • MEUSA Summary • News Source NEVADA • On 27 March 2014, in SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. Abbott Laboratories, one or more judges at the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals requested re-review of this previously decided appeal (which both parties already decided not to pursue any further), so the court asked both parties to state by 17 April 2014 whether their case should be re-heard by all 11 judges of the 9th Circuit, after which the 11 judges will vote whether to re-review the case. On 21 January 2014, the appeals court ruled that “heightened scrutiny” is the new standard by which all future sexual orientation discrimination cases will get decided, so that could change if all the court decides to re-hear the case by all 11 judges. • MEUSA Summary • News Source MICHIGAN • On 28 March 2014, In late March 2014, in April DeBoer & Jayne Rowse v. MI Governor Rick Snyder, et al., a federal challenge to MI laws that deny adoption to certified foster parents when they are not married, and the constitutionality of the state’s 2004 ban on same-gender marriage, civil union, domestic partnership, and joint adoption, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder confirmed that the federal government is recognizing the 322 same-gender civil marriages performed in MI between the time that the MI marriage ban was ruled unconstitutional and the time that MI appealed that ruling, even though MI is ignoring those marriages. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TENNESSEE • On 25 March 2014, in Valeria Tanco, et al. v. TN Governor William Haslam, et al., a federal constitutional challenge to the TN law that bans recognition of same-gender civil marriages, TN asked the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals for a stay on the district court’s order banning TN from enforcing the TN ban on same-gender marriage against the 6 plaintiffs. • MEUSA Summary • News Source OHIO • On 28 march 2014, in Alfred Cowger & Anthony Wesley, Jr. v. Ohio & U.S. Government, et al., a federal lawsuit because the Affordable Care Act doesn’t recognize out-of-Ohio marriages, the plaintiffs dropped their case, after finally obtaining a family health insurance policy. • MEUSA Summary • News Source NEBRASKA • On 28 March 2014, in Bonnie Nichols v. Nebraska, Ms. Nichols petitioned the NE Supreme Court for permission to divorce Margie Nichols, whom she married in IA in 2009. In August 2013, a district court dismissed the case because the NE 2000 constitutional ban on same-gender marriage bars recognition of same-gender marriage and same-gender divorce. The NE Attorney General is arguing before the state court of appeals that: the NE marriage ban is irrelevant, and no one has any federal right to divorce. • MEUSA Summary • News Source VIRGINIA • On 28 March 2014, in Timothy Bostic, et al. vs. VA 4th Circuit Court Clerk George Schaefer, et al., a federal lawsuit challenging VA’s 2006 ban on same-gender marriage and the ban on out-of-state marriages, VA court clerks argued that marriage is solely for the purpose of procreation between mixed-gender spouses, and that same-gender civil marriage would lead to legalization of incest. • MEUSA Summary • News Source KENTUCKY • On 28 March 2014, in Timothy Love, et al. v. Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear (formerly Gregory Bourke & Michael De Leon, et al. v. Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear), a federal lawsuit challenging KY’s ban on recognizing same-gender couples married elsewhere, the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals set the briefing schedule: KY principal brief (7 May 2014), plaintiffs’ principal brief appendix (9 June 2014), KY reply brief (26 June 2014). • MEUSA Summary • News Source TENNESSEE • On 28 Martch 2014, in Valeria Tanco, et al. v. TN Governor William Haslam, et al., a federal constitutional challenge to the TN law that bans recognition of same-gender civil marriage, the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals set the briefing schedule: TN principal brief (7 May 2014), plaintiffs’ principal brief appendix (9 June 2014), TN reply brief (26 June 2014). • MEUSA Summary • News SourceLAWSUITS RESOLVED
STATE LEGISLATION PENDING
MISSOURI • On 27 March 2014, MO state Representative Mike Colona (D) introduced HJR-85, which would repeal the 2004 constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriage and legalize it. • MEUSA Summary • News Source MISSISSIPPI • On 27 March 2014, the MS Senate sent SB-2681, MS Religious Freedom Restoration Act (which would legalize discrimination whenever the discriminator claims religious belief as the excuse) to conference with the House, because the bill dies if a final version is not filed by 31 March 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE LEGISLATION ENACTED
STATE BALLOT MEASURES
Send questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy and Legal Update - March 10-16, 2014
Marriage Equality USA Projects Manager Ned Flaherty closely monitors marriage equality polls, ballots, laws, and lawsuits nationwide, and keeps the MEUSA website updated with changes in these areas on a near-daily basis. Every Monday we update you via our blog with policy and legal updates covering the preceding week.
You may always find the most up-to-date information, including changes that have taken place between these weekly posts, on the Current Policy & Legal Status page on the MEUSA website.
Send questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy & Legal Updates
March 10 – 16, 2014NATIONAL MAP
NATIONAL POLLS
STATE POLLS
NATIONAL LEGISLATION PENDING
NATIONAL LEGISLATION ENACTED
LAWSUITS PENDING
VIRGINIA • On 10 March 2014, in Timothy Bostic, et al. vs. VA 4th Circuit Court Clerk George Schaefer, et al., a federal lawsuit challenging VA’s 2006 ban on same-gender marriage, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals allowed plaintiffs for Joanne Harris, et al. v. VA State Registrar Janet Rainey, et al.to join the appeal, with an expedited hearing date of May 12-15. Briefs are due from defendants by 28 March 2014, from plaintiffs by 11 April, and the defendants’ reply is due by 30 April. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ALABAMA • On 12 March 2014, in Shrie Michelle Richmond & Kirsten Allysse Richmond v. Madison County Circuit Clerk, a judge denied a divorce for two women who married in IA in 2012, and their attorney said they will appeal. • MEUSA Summary • News Source WISCONSIN • On 11 March 2014, in Virginia Wolf & Carol Schumacher, et al., v. WI Governor Scott Walker, et al., a federal lawsuit for 4 couples challenging the 2006 WI ban on same-gender civil marriage or civil union, and WI's unique ban on marrying elsewhere, for which each spouse faces up to $10,000 in fines and 9 months in prison as soon as they return to WI, plaintiffs withdrew their request to suspend enforcement of the same-gender civil marriage ban while their lawsuit is pending, in exchange for (1) a quick ruling and (2) an agreement that two of the plaintiff couples will not be prosecuted for marrying in another state. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARIZONA • On 13 March 2014, in Nelda Majors & Karen Bailey, et al. v. AZ Attorney General Tom Horne, et al., Lambda Legal filed a federal lawsuit for 7 couples, and the surviving spouses of 2 additional same-gender couples, challenging the AZ 1996 and 1999 laws and the AZ 2006 constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriage. • MEUSA Summary • News Source FLORIDA • On 12 March 2014, in Sloan Grimsley & Joyce Albu, et al., v. FL Governor Rick Scott, et al., ACLU filed a federal lawsuit for 8 same-gender couples and SAVE, challenging the FL ban on recognizing marriage licenses from elsewhere. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TENNESSEE • On 14 March 2014, in Valeria Tanco, et al. v. TN Governor William Haslam, et al., a constitutional challenge to the TN law that bans recognition of same-gender civil marriage, a judge issued a preliminary injunction requiring TN to recognize the marriage licenses obtained by the (now) 3 plaintiff couples from other states, so long as their lawsuit remains in progress. The judge noted that “all signs indicate that, in the eyes of the United States Constitution ... that proscriptions against same-sex marriage will soon become a footnote in the annals of American history.” • MEUSA Summary • News Source WISCONSIN • On 14 March 2014, in Virginia Wolf & Carol Schumacher, et al., v. WI Governor Scott Walker, et al., a federal lawsuit for 4 couples challenging the 2006 WI ban on same-gender civil marriage or civil union, and WI’s unique ban on marrying elsewhere, for which each spouse faces up to $10,000 in fines and 9 months in prison as soon as they return to WI, WI Department of Justice asked that the case be put on hold until the WI Supreme Court decides whether the WI domestic partner registry violates the WI ban on same-gender civil marriage in Julaine Appling, et al., v. WI Governor Scott Walker, et al. • MEUSA Summary • News Source INDIANA • On 14 March 2014, in Midori Fujii, et al. v. IN Governor Michael Pence, ACLU of IN filed a federal suit for 13 plaintiffs (5 gay couples, 1 widow, and 2 children) challenging the IN ban on same-gender civil marriage in IN and elsewhere, funeral arrangements, and inheritance taxes. • MEUSA Summary • News Source INDIANA • On 14 March 2014, in Pamela Lee & Candace Batten-Lee, et al. v. IN Governor Michael Pence, et al., a federal suit was filed seeking marriage rights and benefits for public workers. • MEUSA Summary • News Source INDIANA • On 10 March 2014, in Rae Baskin & Esther Fuller, et al. v. Bogan, et al., Lambda Legal filed a federal suit for 3 couples challenging the IN same-gender civil marriage ban, and especially end-of-life health care. • MEUSA Summary • News Source INDIANA • On 14 March 2014, in Bowling, Bowling & Bruner v. IN Governor Michael Pence, 2 lesbian women filed a federal lawsuit to have their IA marriage recognized by IN, and an additional plaintiff sued because her IA marriage was never recognized by IN. • MEUSA Summary • News Source OHIO • On 26 February 2014, in Jim Obergefell & John Arthur v. OH Public Health Director Theodore Wymyslo, a federal marriage recognition lawsuit, the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied the plaintiffs’ motion for an expedited briefing schedule, and instead set a deadline of 30 May for all 3 briefs from both parties. • MEUSA Summary • News Source KENTUCKY • On 14 March 2014, in Timothy Love, et al. v. Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear (formerly Gregory Bourke & Michael De Leon, et al. v. Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear), a federal lawsuit challenging KY’s ban on recognizing same-gender couples married elsewhere, KY Governor Steve Beshear asked the court to delay the 20 March 2014 effective date when KY must start recognizing same-gender civil marriages from other states. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceLAWSUITS RESOLVED
STATE LEGISLATION PENDING
STATE LEGISLATION ENACTED
STATE BALLOT MEASURES
- Legalized Discrimination • On 14 March 2014, the OR attorney general titled ballot initiative IP-52, “Religious Belief Exceptions to the Anti-Discrimination Laws...” IP-52 is sponsored by two anti-LGBT organizations (Friends of Religious Freedom, Oregon Family Council). • MEUSA Summary • News Source
Send questions and comments to: [email protected].
Reflections on Arizona’s Vetoed Anti-Gay Legislation: Time to Seize the Moment
Arizona’s recently failed attempt to enact a law permitting restaurants, hotels, and other businesses to deny services to LGBT people, under the guise of religious liberty, rightly raised the ire of LGBT people and all those who oppose discrimination. The nationwide attention the bill received also has a silver lining.
It awakened Americans to the fact that LGBT people currently have no protections against discrimination in public accommodations under federal law, and that only 13 states prohibit such discrimination against LGBT people (and another 8 states outlaw such discrimination against lesbian and gay people). In other words, even without the failed legislation, businesses in 29 states, including Arizona, currently can discriminate against LGBT people with legal impunity (if no local ordinance exists) because these states have no statutes prohibiting such discrimination, and federal law contains no such prohibition.
Ironically, our opponents’ efforts to enact this draconian legislation have educated Americans to the fact that LGBT people need these legal protections nationwide. It’s time for those who oppose discrimination in all its invidious forms to demand federal legislation to prohibit such discrimination against LGBT people.
The vetoed Arizona legislation also reminds us once again that we are all in this struggle together. Former Congressman Norman Mineta, speaking to the Japanese American Citizens League about marriage discrimination against same-sex couples, said “a threat to anybody’s civil rights is a threat to the civil rights of all Americans.” Nowhere is this insight more evident than the Right Wing’s efforts, under the guise of religious protection, to undermine gains in equality that LGBT people, other minorities, and women have gained over the last six decades.
Later this month, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in cases where owners of public businesses claim that their religious views about contraception should take precedence over the medical choices that female employees and their doctors make about what is in the best interest of the women employees. A decision in favor of the owners could dramatically narrow women’s opportunities in the workplace, and limit their autonomy over medical decisions – all under the guise of religious freedom.
Similarly, interpreting the First Amendment to allow business owners to use religion to justify discrimination could open a gaping hole in many other statutes that prohibit discrimination again minorities and women in employment and public accommodations. After all, the trial court judge inLoving v. Virginia, the case in which the US Supreme Court ultimately overturned laws that banned interracial couples from marriage, ruled in favor such bans, proclaiming: “Almighty God created …(different) races …and placed them on separate continents…(this) fact…shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.” Religion could once again be used in innumerable contexts to justify discrimination.
The backlash against the Arizona bill is already causing other state legislatures to rethink passing similar measures. It’s time to seize the moment and enact federal legislation to protect LGBT people from discrimination in public accommodations nationwide.
By MEUSA National Media Director Stuart Gaffney and MEUSA Director of Legal & Policy John Lewis
This article originally appeared in SF Bay Times, March 6, 2014: http://sfbaytimes.com/reflections-on-arizonas-vetoed-anti-gay-legislation-time-to-seize-the-moment/
Policy and Legal Update - February 3-9, 2014
Marriage Equality USA Projects Manager Ned Flaherty closely monitors marriage equality polls, ballots, laws, and lawsuits nationwide, and keeps the MEUSA website updated with changes in these areas on a near-daily basis. Every Monday we update you via our blog with policy and legal updates covering the preceding week.
You may always find the most up-to-date information, including changes that have taken place between these weekly posts, on the Current Policy & Legal Status page on the MEUSA website.
Policy & Legal Updates
February 3 – 9, 2014NATIONAL MAP
NATIONAL POLLS
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
LAWSUITS
MICHIGAN • On 6 February 2014, in April DeBoer & Jayne Rowse v. MI Governor Rick Snyder, et al., a suit challenging the MI laws that deny adoption to certified foster parents when they are not married, the plaintiffs sought to ban the testimony of sociology professor Mark Regnerus because his flawed methods, rejection by peers, lack of qualifications, unreliability, irrelevance don’t meet the minimum requirements for federal evidence. Trial is scheduled for 25 February 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 6 February 2014, in Jonell Evans, et al. v. State of Utah, a case seeking immediate recognition of all marriages between same-gender couples who were married from 20 December 2013 through 6 January 2014, the plaintiffs asked for an expedited hearing. • MEUSA Summary • News Source LOUISIANA • On 27 January 2014, in Jonathan Robicheaux and Derek Pinton, et al. v. LA Attorney General James Caldwell, a federal case challenging the LA constitutional amendment and state law banning same-gender civil marriage, and banning LA recognition of same-gender couples married elsewhere, Judge Martin Feldman denied a request to un-consolidate this case (#2013-cv-05090) from another case (#2014-cv-00097). • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARKANSAS • On 31 January 2014, in Rita & Pam Jernigan et al. v. Crane et al., a federal lawsuit seeking same-gender civil marriages, AR asked a federal judge to dismiss the lawsuit challening the 2004 AR constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriage. • MEUSA Summary • News Source WISCONSIN • On 3 February 2014, in Virginia Wolf & Carol Schumacher, et al., v. WI Governor Scott Walker, et al., ACLU filed a federal lawsuit for 4 couples challenging the 2006 WI ban on same-gender civil marriage or civil union, and WI's unique ban on marrying elsewhere, for which each spouse faces up to $10,000 in fines and 9 months in prison as soon as they return to WI. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE LEGISLATION & POLLS
ARIZONA • On 5 February 2014, the Camp Verde, AZ council voted against recognizing civil unions for same-gender couples. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 29 January 2014, UT state Representative Merrill Nelson proposed a law so that citizens can donate funds via their UT tax return for legalizing discrimination against same-gender couples. • MEUSA Summary • News Source KANSAS • On 6 February 2014, HB-2453, which would legalize discrimination by individuals, businesses, and government against same-gender couples whenever the excuse is religious beliefs, passed from committee to the full House for a vote. • MEUSA Summary • News Source INDIANA • IN Republicans criminalized the performance of any religious ceremony that religiously marries two people of the same gender, starting 1 July 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 27 January 2014, state Rep. Jacob Anderegg (R) introduced 2 bills (HB-231, HJR-1) that would prevent clergy from being forced to solemnize marriages against their beliefs. • MEUSA Summary • News Source VIRGINIA • On 3 Febuary 2014, the Republican-led VA House of Representatives passed HB-706, a bill that would let any state lawmaker defend the VA ban on same-gender civil marriage in place of the governor and attorney general. The bill also needs approval of the VA Senate, then the VA governor. • MEUSA Summary • News Source WEST VIRGINIA • On 4 February 2014, the Morgantown, WV City Council unanimously approved a resolution supporting marriage equality in the WV legislature. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARIZONA • On 4 February 2014, an AZ House Government Committee passed HB-2153, which legalizes discrimination against LGBT people whenever the perpetrator claims religious beliefs as the excuse for the discrimination. SB-1062 also passed its respective committee in the AZ Senate. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 4 February 2014, Bexar County, TX extended health benefits to county workers' same-gender spouses. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARIZONA • On 5 February 2014, an AZ House committee approved a bill to legalize discrimination against LGBT people whenever religious belief is the excuse. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TENNESSEE • On 6 February 2014, TN state Senator Brian Kelsey (R) and Representative Bill Dunn (R) proposed SB-2566 and HB-2467, to legalize discrimination against same-gender couples in domestic partnerships, civil unions, and marriages, whenever the discrimination is excused by claims of religious belief. • MEUSA Summary • News Source KENTUCKY POLLS • On WKYT-TV, WHAS-TV, and 2 newspapers surveyed 1,082 registered voters on same-gender civil marriage, and reported that 55% oppose it, 35% support it, and 10% aren’t sure. • MEUSA Summary • News Source WISCONSIN POLLS • On 29 October 2013, Marquette University surveyed 800 WI registered voters on same-gender civil marriage, and reported that 53% support it, 24% support only civil union, 19% oppose all legal recognition of same-gender couples, with 4% unaccounted for. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE BALLOTS & POLLS
OHIO • On 9 February 2014, FreedomOhio announced it has gathered 650,000 petition signatures, hopes to reach 1,000,000 by summer, and will decide later whether the statewide vote occurs in 2014 or 2016. • MEUSA Summary • News Source Send questions and comments to: [email protected].Policy and Legal Update - January 13-19, 2014
Marriage Equality USA Projects Manager Ned Flaherty closely monitors marriage equality polls, ballots, laws, and lawsuits nationwide, and keeps the MEUSA website updated with changes in these areas on a near-daily basis. Every Monday we update you via our blog with policy and legal updates covering the preceding week.
You may always find the most up-to-date information, including changes that have taken place between these weekly posts, on the Current Policy & Legal Status page on the MEUSA website.
Send questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy & Legal Updates
January 13 – 19, 2014NATIONAL MAP
NATIONAL POLLS
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
LAWSUITS
PENNSYLVANIA • On 13 January 2014, in Cara Palladino & Isabelle Barker v. PA Governor Corbett et al., a federal suit to force PA to recognize all out-of-state marriages equally, the plaintiffs asked the court for a summary judgment (without a full trial). • MEUSA Summary • News Source OKLAHOMA • On 14 January 2014, in Mary Bishop, et al. v. United States and Tulsa County Court Clerk, et al., a federal suit challenging the OK constitution for denying same-gender civil marriage rights and for refusing to recognize same-gender marriages performed elsewhere, the district court ruled that the marriage ban is unconstitutional. That ruling is stayed pending appeal(s). Of all the same-gender civil marriage cases nationwide, this one is the oldest unresolved case. • MEUSA Summary • News Source KENTUCKY • On 14 January 2014, in Gregory Bourke v. KY Governor Steve Beshear, et al., a challenge to the 2004 constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, the plaintiffs filed their final brief, and the court is about to decide whether to issue a final ruling without a trial. • MEUSA Summary • News Source OHIO • On 16 January 2014, in Jim Obergefell & John Arthur v. OH Public Health Director Theodore Wymyslo, about OH recognition of legal marriages from other states when issuing death certificates, OH attorney general Mike DeWine appealed the district court ruling to the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. • MEUSA Summary • News Source PENNSYLVANIA • On 13 January 2014, in Cara Palladino & Isabelle Barker v. PA Governor Corbett et al., rearding recognition by PA of legal marriages performed elsewhere, the plaintiffs asked the court to skip the trial and issue a final ruling. • MEUSA Summary • News Source OKLAHOMA • On 16 January 2014, in Mary Bishop, et al. v. United States and Tulsa County Court Clerk, et al., challenging the state constitution for denying the right to marry the person of one’s own choice, and for refusing to recognize same-gender marriages performed in other states, Tulsa County Clerk Sally Howe Smith, represented by the notorious anti-LGBT group Alliance Defending Freedom, appealed to the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 17 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., a federal lawsuit challenging UT’s constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, UT asked the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for 10 extra days to write its arguments opposing same-gender civil marriage, and the plaintiffs opposed that request. • MEUSA Summary • News Source OKLAHOMA • On 17 January 2014, in Mary Bishop, et al. v. United States and Tulsa County Court Clerk, et al., a challenge to the state constitution for denying the right to marry the person of one’s own choice, for refusing to recognize same-gender marriages performed in other states, and for other aspects of the federal Defense-of-Marriage Act, OK requested the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to: (1) set a fast briefing schedule; (2) assign this appeal to the same judges hearing the UT appeal; and (3) allow amicus briefs to be filed jointly covering both cases. • MEUSA Summary • News Source OREGON • On 17 January 2014, in Rachel Cryer & Laurel Bowman vs. Sweet Cakes by Melissa Bakery, the OR Bureau of Labor and Industries decided that a bakery violated the civil rights of a same-gender couple by refusing to bake a cake for the women’s wedding. If the state is unsuccessful helping the parties reach a settlement, the Bureau may pursue court charges. The bakers insist that their religion compels them to unlawfully discriminate against same-gender couples. Equality opponents often cite this case when arguing that marriage equality laws eliminate religious freedom. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 16 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., a federal lawsuit challenging UT’s constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, UT decided to pay $300,000 to the 3 attorneys who, with help from 2 UT state employees, will argue to ban same-gender civil marriage before the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in March. Their fee for the U.S. Supreme Court appeal would be similar. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE LEGISLATION & POLLS
VIRGINIA • On 9 January 2014, VA House Privileges and Elections Committee Chair Mark Cole (R) postponed all constitutional amendment hearings from 2014 to 2015. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 14 January 2014, the Salt Lake City Tribune surveyed 600 UT adults on same-gender civil marriage, and reported that 48% said yes, 48% said no, and 4% were unsure. • MEUSA Summary • News Source COLORADO • On 14 January 2014, CO Senate Bill 19 passed the Senate Finance Committee, which would allow same-gender couples who file federal tax returns as legally married to also file state tax returns using the same marital status. The bill now proceeds to a vote of the entire Senate. • MEUSA Summary • News Source IDAHO • On 14 January 2014, the ID House Revenue and Taxation Committee approved a rule denying legally married same-gender couples the right to file ID state tax returns jointly. If no lawmaker objects before the end of this legislative session, the tax rule becomes final. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARIZONA • On 15 January 2014, AZ state Senator Steve Yarbrough (R) proposed SB-1062, a law that would legalize discrimination by any person, business, agency, or organization against anyone, whenever the perpetrator says the discrimination is related to religious beliefs. On 16 January 2014, the AZ Senate Government and Environment Committee approved it, 4 Republicans to 2 Democrats. The same law was passed by the legislature in 2012, but vetoed by Governor Jan Brewer, not for any reason related to the law, but in retaliation over a fiscal dispute with lawmakers. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 15 January 2014, the UT Tax Commission reversed an earlier UT decision, and confirmed that same-gender couples who got legally married in UT or elsewhere may file UT income tax returns jointly. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH POLLS • On 17 January 2014, after surveying 746 UT residents, the Deseret News (owned and operated by the Mormon clergy) reported that 57% oppose it, 36% support it, and 6% are undecided; that 51% want to legalize religion-based discrimination by individuals and businesses, 40% don’t, and 9% are undecided; and that among active Mormons, 89% oppose same-gender civil marriage for anybody (people of all faiths, and people of no faith). • MEUSA Summary • News Source SOUTH CAROLINA • On 15 January 2014, SC House Minority Leader Todd Rutherford (D) filed a bill that would let same-gender couples who are legally married elsewhere file SC state income taxes jointly. • MEUSA Summary • News Source SOUTH CAROLINA • On 15 January 2014, SC House Minority Leader Todd Rutherford (D) filed a bill to repeal the 2006 constitutional amendment that banned same-gender civil marriage. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE BALLOTS & POLLS
INDIANA • On 14 January 2014, two IN city councils (Muncie, South Bend) joined three others (Indianapolis, Evansville, Bloomington) and voted to oppose any constitutional amendment that would ban same-gender civil marriage. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARKANSAS • On 18 January 2014, Arkansas Initiative for Marriage Equality began petitioning to repeal the 2004 constitutional ban against same-gender civil marriage, via the 2016 ballot. Valid signatures are needed from at least 10% of all 2014 voters and 5% of the voters in 15 counties. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSend questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy and Legal Update - January 6-12, 2014
Marriage Equality USA Projects Manager Ned Flaherty closely monitors marriage equality polls, ballots, laws, and lawsuits nationwide, and keeps the MEUSA website updated with changes in these areas on a near-daily basis. Every Monday we update you via our blog with policy and legal updates covering the preceding week.
You may always find the most up-to-date information, including changes that have taken place between these weekly posts, on the Current Policy & Legal Status page on the MEUSA website.
Send questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy & Legal Updates
January 6 – 12, 2014NATIONAL MAP
- On 7 January 2014, the David Pakman TV-radio show reported on national marriage equality progress provided by MEUSA’s Ned Flaherty. • News Source
NATIONAL POLLS
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
- On 9 January 2014, U.S. Representative Randy Weber (R-TX) introduced the State Marriage Defense Act of 2014 (H.R. #3829), which would: (1) force the federal government to ignore the legal civil marriages of same-gender couples who reside in any state that ignores such marriages; and (2) always dissolve or restore the legal civil marriage of every same-gender couple whenever one or both spouses cross a state border, and the state of entry treats same-gender couples differently than the state of exit. Lawmakers favoring it include 28 Representatives (all Republicans, 11 from TX). Based on history, the chance of enactment is 2%. • MEUSA Summary • News Source
LAWSUITS
MICHIGAN • On 3 January 2014, in April DeBoer & Jayne Rowse v. MI Governor Rick Snyder, et al., a case challenging the constitutionality of the state’s 2004 ban on same-gender marriage, civil union, domestic partnership, and joint adoption, the judge granted the plaintiffs’ request to split the trial into 2 parts. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 6 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., a case challenging Utah’s constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the district court ruling until the Tenth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is finished with the case. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARIZONA • On 6 January 2014, in Joseph Connolly, et. al., v. AZ Governor Jan Brewer, et al., four couples filed a class action lawsuit in federal court challenging the AZ’s 1996 statutory marriage ban and its 2004 constitutional marriage ban. • MEUSA Summary • News Source COLORADO • On 6 January 2014, in Charlie Craig & David Mullins v. Masterpiece Cakeshop et al.,the baker’s attorneys, Alliance Defending Freedom, filed an appeal of the court order to stop discriminating against same-gender couples. Equality opponents often cite this famous case when they argue that marriage equality ends religious freedom and free speech. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 7 January 2014, in Cleopatra De Leon, et al., v. TX Governor Rick Perry et al., a federal class action challenge to the 2005 TX constitutional ban on marriage inside and outside TX, the judge denied permission for anti-LGBT group Texas Values to file a friend-of-the-court brief (which cited work by discredited University of Texas assistant professor Dr. Mark Regnerus) because the brief cited no legal authority, and did nothing to resolve the legal issues. Texas Values wrote that same-gender couples are inferior to mixed-gender couples, and that the American Psychological Association wrongly concluded that LGBT parents raise well-adjusted children. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 8 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., a challenge to UT’s constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) joined as co-counsel for the plaintiffs. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 8 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., a challenge to UT’s constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, the UT Attorney General said that for the 2,720 people who married a same-gender spouse from 20 December through 6 January, those marriages are doubtful, and their validity will be determined after appeals to the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in 2014 and possibly the U.S. Supreme Court in 2015. In the meantime, recognition and benefits for those 2,720 citizens will be decided by a special review team, on a case-by-case basis. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 9 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., a challenge to UT’s constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, the UT Attorney General confirmed that a marriage certificate can be completed for each marriage that was performed prior to the decision to issue a stay. • MEUSA Summary • News Source IDAHO • On 9 January 2014, in Sue Latta, et al. v. ID Governor C. L. Butch Otter, a federal lawsuit challenging the 2006 state constitutional amendment, and Idaho laws, banning same-gender civil marriage and civil union, the ID attorney general filed motions seeking (1) to dismiss the case on the premise that marriage is not a fundamental right, and (2) to intervene in the case. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 9 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., Human Rights Campaign asked the U.S. government to recognize all same-gender couples who were legally married in UT between 20 December 2013 and 6 January 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News Source MISSOURI • On 8 January 2014, in MO Baptist Convention, et al. v. MO Governor Jay Nixon, et al.,anti-LGBT groups sued MO for accepting jointly filed tax returns from same-gender couples who were legally married in other states. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 9 January 2014, in Cleopatra De Leon, et al., v. TX Governor Rick Perry et al., a federal class action lawsuit for all TX couples, challenging the 2005 TX constitutional ban on marriage inside and outside TX, the judge rejected an effort by the TX attorney general to consolidate two other suits (Shannon Zahrn, et al. v. TX Governor Rick Perry, et al., and Christopher McNosky, et al. v. TX Governor Rick Perry, et al.) into this one. On 12 February 2014, the court will hear a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the state from enforcing the ban during the litigation. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 31 October 2013, in Shannon Zahrn, et al. v. TX Governor Rick Perry, et al., two same-gender couples filed a class action suit seeking equal marriage rights for all TX couples, and challenging the TX statutory and constitutional bans on same-gender civil marriage. On 9 January 2014, the judge forCleopatra De Leon, et al., v. TX Governor Rick Perry et al. rejected an effort by the TX attorney general to consolidate this case and Christopher McNosky, et al. v. TX Governor Rick Perry, et al. into the De Leon case. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 29 July 2013, in Christopher McNosky, et al. v. TX Governor Rick Perry, et al., a same-gender couple representing themselves sued for equal marriage rights, challenging the TX statutory and constitutional bans on same-gender civil marriage. On 9 January 2014, the judge for Cleopatra De Leon, et al., v. TX Governor Rick Perry et al. rejected an effort by the TX attorney general to consolidate this case and Shannon Zahrn, et al. v. TX Governor Rick Perry, et al. into the De Leon case. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 10 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., a federal lawsuit challenging UT’s constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, the U.S. government confirmed that it recognizes all same-gender civil marriages performed in UT from 20 December 2013 through 6 January 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE LEGISLATION & POLLS
COLORADO • On 10 January 2014, state Senator Pat Steadman proposed a law allowing same-gender couples who file federal tax returns as legally married to also file state tax returns using the same marital status. • MEUSA Summary • News Source VIRGINIA #3 • On 8 January 2014, 9 state lawmakers (6 delegates, 3 senators) sponsored resolutions to repeal VA's 2006 constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriage. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH POLLS • On 3 January 2014, Google Consumer Surveys polled 500 adult Internet users in Utah (selected to match the U.S. Census Bureau’s monthly Current Population Survey based on gender, age, urbanicity, and income) regarding views on same-gender civil marriage, and reported that 42% approve, 31% want no recognition at all, 24% approve only of civil unions, and 3% have other opinions. • MEUSA Summary • News Source PENNSYLVANIA • On 9 January 2014, spouse benefits for employees of Lehigh County, PA were canceled by new county executive Tom Muller because such benefits must be first approved by county commissioners, which he will ask them to do later this year. • MEUSA Summary • News Source MISSOURI • On 9 January 2014, MO Governor Jay Nixon (D) said that legally married couples (including same-gender couples legally married elsewhere) who file federal tax returns jointly now must also file MO tax returns jointly. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE BALLOTS & POLLS
INDIANA • On 9 January 2014, four Republican Representatives re-proposed HRJ-6 renamed as HJR-3, which would ban same-gender civil marriage, other unions, and related benefits via the state constitution. If approved by the House Judiciary Committee, and then by the House and by the Senate, it would appear on the November 2014 ballot. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSend questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy and Legal Update - December 30, 2013 - January 5, 2014
Marriage Equality USA Projects Manager Ned Flaherty closely monitors marriage equality polls, ballots, laws, and lawsuits nationwide, and keeps the MEUSA website updated with changes in these areas on a near-daily basis. Every Monday we update you via our blog with policy and legal updates covering the preceding week.
You may always find the most up-to-date information, including changes that have taken place between these weekly posts, on the Current Policy & Legal Status page on the MEUSA website.
Send questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy & Legal Updates
30 December 2013 – 5 January 2014NATIONAL MAP
On 25 December 2013, a National Public Radio broadcast on marriage equality reviewed 2013 and previewed 2014 with MEUSA’s Ned Flaherty. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceNATIONAL POLLS
On 7 October 2013, Associated Press-GfK Public Affairs surveyed 1,227 American adults (demographically balanced by age, sex, education, race, phone type) on same-gender civil marriage, and reported that 36%support it, 33% do not, and 29% are undecided, and 3% did not answer. • News SourceNATIONAL LEGISLATION
LAWSUITS
ARIZONA • On 23 December 2010, in Joseph Diaz, et al., v. Janice Brewer, et al., a federal judge certified the worker benefits case as a class action lawsuit representing all state workers with same-gender partners. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 30 December 2013, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Attorney General John Swallow, et al., a federal case challenging Utah’s constitutional amendment banning same-gender civil marriage, the Appeals Court set an expedited 2014 schedule: state’s appeal brief by 27 January, couples’ response brief by 18 February, state’s reply brief by 25 February, oral arguments in March. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • UTAH - On 31 December 2013, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Attorney Governor Gary Herbert, et al., UT asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the original ruling and suspend same-gender civil marriages while appeals go through the U.S. Tenth Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court. A reply from the same-gender couples is expected on 3 January, with a decision on the stay request the following week. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 31 December 2013, in Jack Pidegon & Larry Hicks vs. Houston Mayor Annise Parker, et al., a case about worker same-gender spouse benefits, Houston’s attorney got the case moved from state district family court into federal court, where the next court date is 6 January 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News Source WEST VIRGINIA • On 31 December 2013, in Casie Jo McGee, et al. v. Cabell County Clerk Karen Cole, et al., in this suit challenging the WV law that bans marriage equality, the plaintiffs asked for a summary judgment. • MEUSA Summary • News Source KANSAS • On 31 December 2013, in Michael Nelson, et al. v. KS Department of Revenue, two legally married same-gender couples sued for the right to file joint state income tax returns. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 2 January 2014, in Jack Pidegon & Larry Hicks vs. Houston Mayor Annise Parker, et al.,the federal judge denied the Houston Republican Party’s request for a stay against the city policy, and reversed the district court approval of that stay, thereby restoring equal worker benefits for same-gender spouses. Republican plaintiffs said they will try to move the case back to state court on 21 January 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 3 January 2014, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Governor Gary Herbert, et al., the same-gender couples filed a reply arguing why marriages should continue during the state's appeal of the district court ruling. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE LEGISLATION & POLLS
STATE BALLOTS & POLLS
TEXAS • On 1 January 2014, Equality Texas and Freedom to Marry launched Why Marriage Matters Texas, a campaign to increase TX support for marriage equality. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 19 December 2013, UT state Representative Jacob Anderegg introduced H.J.R.-1, Joint Resolution on Religious Liberty, which would amend the UT constitution to excuse religious organizations from having to recognize any marriage in violation of conscience of faith. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH POLLS • On 3 January 2014, Salt Lake City’s Fox-13 TV surveyed readers on same-gender civil marriages, and reported that 73% support, 21% don’t, 5% want government not involved, and 1% don’t know/don’t care. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSend questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy and Legal Update - December 16-22, 2013
Marriage Equality USA Projects Manager Ned Flaherty closely monitors marriage equality polls, ballots, laws, and lawsuits nationwide, and keeps the MEUSA website updated with changes in these areas on a near-daily basis. Every Monday we update you via our blog with policy and legal updates covering the preceding week.
You may always find the most up-to-date information, including changes that have taken place between these weekly posts, on the Current Policy & Legal Status page on the MEUSA website.
Send questions and comments to: [email protected].
Policy & Legal Updates
December 16 – 22, 2013NATIONAL MAP
• On 19 & 20 December 2013, MEUSA’s National Marriage Map was updated to reflect the results of the rulings from both the NM Supreme Court and the U.S. District Court for UT: (1) Over 39% of Americans live in 19 states that have adopted full, state-level equality: CA, CT, DC, DE, HI, IA, IL, MA, MD, ME, MN, NH, NJ, NM, NY, RI, UT, VT, WA); (2) and more live cities, counties, or states with partial equality (mainly CO, NV, OR, WI), but 50% live in 33 jurisdictions that still ban all types of unions except one-man-one-woman couples. • MapNATIONAL POLLS
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
LAWSUITS
COLORADO • On 6 December 2013, in Charlie Craig & David Mullins v. Masterpiece Cakeshop et al.,a CO judge ruled that: (1) a baker violated the CO Public Accommodation Law by refusing to sell a cake to a same-gender couple, and (2) having to sell all products to all couples does not violate any baker’s free speech rights, or anyone’s rights to free exercise of religion. Equality opponents cite this famous case frequently when they argue that marriage equality ends religious freedom and free speech. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ILLINOIS • On 16 December 2013, in Darby v. Orr, a federal judge agreed with Lambda Legal attorneys, and ordered that all IL couples in which a partner suffers a life-threatening illness can marry prior to the 1 June 2014 start of same-gender civil marriages. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ILLINOIS • On 6 December 2013, in Brenda Lee, et al. v. Cook County Clerk David Orr, four same-gender couples filed a federal suit seeking to marry immediately instead of waiting for the 1 June start date. • MEUSA Summary • News Source PENNSYLVANIA • On 17 December 2013, in Deb & Susan Whitewood v. PA Governor Tom Corbett et al., in which 23 people are challenging the 1996 PA law that bans same-gender marriage for residents, and that ignores out-of-state same-gender marriages, U.S. District Judge John Jones rejected the argument of PA lawyers (whose team charges at least $725 each hour) that this court lacks authority to decide the case, and then he blocked any higher court review at this time. The trial starts on 9 June 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 17 December 2013, in Jack Pidegon & Larry Hicks vs. Houston Mayor Annise Parker, et al., with plaintiffs represented by Harris County GOP Chairman Jared Woodfill, a TX district judge temporarily prohibited Houston, TX from offering partner benefits to same-gender couples. A hearing is set for 6 January 2014. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ILLINOIS • On 17 December 2013, in Darby v. Orr, the court dismissed the case since the relief that the plaintiffs were seeking occurred when IL enacted a same-gender civil marriage law on 5 November 2013. • MEUSA Summary • News Source NEW MEXICO • On 19 December 2013, in Rose Griego, et al., v. NM Bernalillo County Clerk Maggie Oliver, the NM Supreme Court unanimously ruled that same-gender and mixed-gender couples, and their civil marriages, are guaranteed equal rights, protection, and responsibilities under the law, effective immediately. The court rejected 3 arguments put forth by the opponents of equality: (1) mixed-gender marriages benefit when same-gender marriages are banned and mixed-gender marriages suffer when same-gender marriages are allowed; (2) marriage requires procreation and procreation requires marriage; and (3) same-gender couples don’t raise children from prior marriage, fertilization, surrogacy, foster care, and/or adoption. • MEUSA Summary • News Source WEST VIRGINIA • On 17 December 2013, in Casie Jo McGee, et al. v. Cabell County Clerk Karen Cole, et al., the WV attorney general asked a federal judge to dismiss the suit challenging WV’s law banning same-gender civil marriage, arguing that the plaintiffs, who are not now legally married anywhere, are suffering no harm. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARKANSAS • On 19 December 2013, in Kendall Wright et al. v. AR Governor Michael Beebe, et al., in which 21 same-gender couples seek to overturn the 2004 AR constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriage, the statutory ban, and the federal law allowing states to ignore same-gender marriages from other states, the judge decided not to dismiss the suit, and also decided that couples may not marry while the case is pending. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 20 December 2013, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Attorney General John Swallow, et al., the court rejected UT’s arguments that: (1) marriage is not a right; (2) states can deny marriage to certain citizens; (3) “responsible procreation” is a reason to exclude same-gender couples, and (4) same-gender parents raising children is harmful, and then declared the UT same-gender civil marriage ban an irrational, unconstitutional denial of a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution, and allowed marriages to begin the same day. Hours later, UT appealed the decision, and filed a motion seeking to halt marriages during the appeal case. • MEUSA Summary • News Source TEXAS • On 20 December 2013, in Jack Pidegon & Larry Hicks vs. Houston Mayor Annise Parker, et al., the city of Houston said it will appeal the 17 December court order barring domestic partner benefits for same-gender spouses of city employees. • MEUSA Summary • News Source UTAH • On 22 December 2013, in Kitchen, et al. v. Utah Attorney General John Swallow, et al., in which 3 couples challenged UT’s 2004 constitutional amendment banning same-gender marriage, the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied UT’s request to suspend the district court ruling while the district court decides whether to suspend its own ruling during the time that the case is on appeal; consequently, marriages legalized by the 20 December ruling may continue throughout the appeal process, unless the district court reverses its earlier decision. On 23 December or later, Federal District Judge Robert Shelby will decide whether to halt marriages while UT appeals the case. His decision about halting marriages during the appeal could also be appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court, as well as to the U.S. Supreme Court, where Justice Sotomayor would grant the halt, deny the halt, or ask the full Court to decide. • MEUSA Summary • News Source NORTH CAROLINA • On 20 December 2012, in Marcie Fisher-Borne, et al. v. John Smith, et al., in which the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued several state judges in federal court on behalf of 6 same-gender couples and their children seeking adoption and marriage rights, Republican lawmakers engaged free legal help from Alliance Defending Freedom, an anti-LGBT law firm, to defend the state’s constitutional ban on same-gender civil marriage. • MEUSA Summary • News Source OREGON • On 19 December 2013, in Paul Rummell, et al. v. OR Governor John Kitzhaber, et al.,two Portland couples filed a federal lawsuit challenging OR’s ban on same-gender civil marriage. They hope to combine their suit into Deanna Geiger, et al. v. OR Governor John Kitzhaber, et al., which was filed on 15 October. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE LEGISLATION & POLLS
NEW JERSEY • On 9 December 2013, the NJ Senate Judiciary Committee began considering S-3109, Marriage Equality Act, a new version which reduces some of the freedom of the current law, which was imposed after a NJ Supreme Court ruling on 21 October 2013, and which is the strongest in the nation. On 16 December 2013, state Senator Loretta Weinberg withdrew S-3109 from discussion. • MEUSA Summary • News Source FLORIDA • On 16 December, FL state Representative Linda Stewart re-submitted a domestic partner bill. • MEUSA Summary • News Source ARIZONA • On 17 December 2013, Cottonwood, AZ legalized same-gender unions, joining Bisbee, Jerome, Sedona, and Tucson, AZ. • MEUSA Summary • News Source NEW MEXICO • On 19 December 2013, NM state Senator Bill Sharer (R) proposed to amend the NM constitution to ban same-gender civil marriage based on his assumption that same-gender couples have no children. The change would have to pass both chambers of the NM legislature, before appearing on a statewide voter ballot. Similar proposals in 2005, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2013 all failed in the legislature. • MEUSA Summary • News Source FLORIDA • On 18 December 2013, FL state Representative Linda Stewart (D) filed HB-439, which would legalize domestic partners, but give them only a few of the rights and protections available to married people. A similar bill, SB-196, filed in the Senate on 9 January 2013, died in the Judiciary Committee in May 2013. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSTATE BALLOTS & POLLS
OHIO • On 8 December 2013, FreedomOhio surveyed 1,011 reigstered voters on same-gender civil marriage with protection for religions, and reported that 56% support it, 34% oppose it, and 10% are unsure. Separately, 44% believe it is inevitable, 37% do not, and 19% are unsure. • MEUSA Summary • News SourceSend questions and comments to: [email protected].